Van's RV-9 / RV-9A
Lycoming O-320-D2A, 150 hp (canonical; O-235/O-290 also acceptable)
The RV-9 is the cross-country specialist of the Van's family. It uses a longer wing than the RV-6 or RV-7, gives up the aerobatic rating, and trades top-end performance for fuel economy and stability. Most run a 150 hp O-320, cruise at 145 to 160 KTAS, and burn 6 to 8 gph. The longer wing improves climb at altitude and gives the airplane a comfortable cruise feel that pilots transitioning from a Cessna or Piper find natural.
The RV-9 is the right airplane for someone who wants the Van's economics and useful load but doesn't care about aerobatics. It's also the cheapest Van's design to operate per hour because the 150 hp engine and fixed-pitch prop options keep the math simple. This page covers what an RV-9 actually costs in 2026 and where it wins or loses against the RV-7.
History
Van's introduced the RV-9 in 2001 as a deliberate departure from the company's earlier aerobatic-capable airplanes. The brief was simple. Build a non-aerobatic two-seater optimized for cross-country efficiency and predictable handling. Use a longer wing for better climb and slower stall speeds. Give up the high G-load capability and design margin that aerobatic flight requires. Make the airplane more accessible to pilots transitioning from a Cessna 172 or Cherokee.
The RV-9 wing has more area, more aspect ratio, and a different airfoil than the RV-6/RV-7 wing. Stall speed drops to about 47 knots versus 51 for the RV-7. Climb at altitude is noticeably better because the longer wing keeps lift-to-drag in a friendlier place. Cruise speed is 10 to 15 knots slower than an RV-7 with the same engine, but fuel economy is meaningfully better at the same speed.
The RV-9 found a market among pilots who didn't fly aerobatics and didn't need the RV-7's higher cruise speed. Builders who came from certified airplanes often felt more at home in the RV-9 because the handling is more conventional. As of mid-2026, Van's reports about 1,200 RV-9s flying with another 400 in build.
Variants
RV-9 (taildragger)
2001-presentThe taildragger version. About 30% of completed RV-9 airplanes. Sharper feel and slightly faster cruise. Higher insurance and requires current tailwheel time.
RV-9A (nosewheel)
2001-presentNosewheel version. About 70% of completed airplanes. Easier transition for non-tailwheel pilots and easier to insure. Most used RV-9 inventory is RV-9A.
Performance
Performance depends on engine choice. A 150 hp O-320 RV-9A with a fixed-pitch Sensenich prop cruises at 145 to 150 KTAS on 6.5 to 7 gph. A 150 hp O-320 with a Hartzell constant-speed prop adds 3 to 5 knots and brings cruise burn to 7 to 7.5 gph. The RV-9 isn't approved for engines over 160 hp because of the longer wing structure, so there's no IO-360 or IO-390 option the way there is on an RV-7.
Useful load is the RV-9's quiet strength. A typical 150 hp RV-9A with a fixed-pitch prop has about 580 to 620 pounds of useful load. Full fuel is 36 gallons (216 pounds), leaving 360 to 400 pounds for two people and bags. That's competitive with an RV-7 and meaningfully more than an RV-4 or RV-6. Range works out to 800 to 950 nm with reserves at long-range cruise, which is the best in the Van's two-seat family.
Stall speed is about 47 knots versus 51 for an RV-7. That sounds small but it makes a real difference in pattern feel, short-field work, and pilot comfort during transition. The RV-9 lands shorter and slower than the rest of the Van's line.
Powerplant
The Lycoming O-320 (150 hp) is the canonical engine and runs most of the RV-9 fleet. A small number of airplanes use O-235 (118 hp) or O-290 (135 hp) engines for lower cost and lower fuel burn at the price of climb performance. Van's does not approve engines over 160 hp for the RV-9 because the wing structure is sized for lower-power operations only.
Lycoming's published TBO for the O-320 is 2,000 hours per Lycoming Service Instruction 1009 BE, advisory in experimental service. Field overhaul runs $25,000 to $38,000 in 2026 at a name-brand shop. Owner-assisted overhaul saves 30 to 40 percent on labor. The O-320 is one of the most-overhauled engines in general aviation and parts availability is excellent.
About 60% of RV-9 builders chose a fixed-pitch Sensenich metal prop, which costs almost nothing to maintain on condition. The remaining 40% chose a Hartzell or MT constant-speed prop, which adds 3 to 5 knots of cruise and improves climb at the cost of a 2,400-hour or six-year overhaul cycle per Hartzell Service Letter HC-SL-61-61Y Rev 12. That overhaul runs $1,500 to $3,500 in 2026.
Cost of ownership
The RV-9 is the cheapest Van's design to operate per hour. The non-aerobatic mission profile, smaller engine, and predictable cross-country use all keep costs in check.
If you built it: fuel runs $35 to $50 per hour at $5.50 to $7 per gallon and 6.5 to 7.5 gph. Engine reserve is $12 to $19 per hour. Prop reserve is under $1 per hour for a fixed-pitch Sensenich, $1 to $2 per hour for a Hartzell. Airframe maintenance reserve is $6 to $11 per hour, the lowest in the Van's family because the airframe sees easy duty. All-in at 100 hours a year runs $75 to $105 per hour, plus $2,800 to $5,000 in annual fixed costs.
If you bought it used: realistic all-in at 100 hours a year is $95 to $135 per hour. Insurance is lower than other Van's airplanes because the non-aerobatic rating, predictable handling, and easier nosewheel option all reduce risk in the underwriter's model. A used RV-9A buyer with limited RV experience typically pays $1,800 to $3,500 in the first year.
Acquisition cost in mid-2026 runs $70,000 to $100,000 for an older RV-9 with steam gauges, $100,000 to $140,000 for a clean airplane with a glass panel and updated avionics. Low-time examples with full IFR panels occasionally trade above $150,000. The RV-9 typically trades $10,000 to $25,000 below a comparable RV-7.
| Fixed cost | Range | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Hangar RV-9s fit a standard T-hangar with room to spare. | $150–$400 | monthly |
| Condition inspection (A&P sign-off, non-builder) Non-aerobatic profile makes inspections faster than on RV-7 or RV-8. | $400–$900 | annual |
| Insurance (builder, 200+ hrs in type) | $1,200–$2,200 | annual |
| Insurance (used buyer, no RV time) Underwriters discount more aggressively on RV-9A than on aerobatic Van's models. | $1,800–$3,500 | annual |
Estimate the cost for your situation
Defaults are pre-filled for the Van's RV-9 / RV-9A. Tweak fuel price, hangar, insurance, and hours to match your scenario.
Common issues & gotchas
Build quality variance
highThe RV-9 has been built by hundreds of different builders. Build quality varies. A pre-buy should be done by an RV-knowledgeable inspector. The RV-9's longer wing has some build-specific items the inspector should know to look at. Budget $1,000 to $2,000 for a thorough pre-buy.
Repairman certificate doesn't transfer
moderateThe original builder's repairman certificate stays with the builder. Used buyers can still do most of their own maintenance, but the annual condition inspection requires an A&P sign-off at $400 to $900 a year.
Wing spar inspection requirements
moderateVan's published service bulletins covering wing spar attach hardware on a range of RV airplanes including the RV-9. Any pre-buy should verify the relevant SB compliance has been documented and any specified inspections have been completed. The forum has detailed threads on which serial numbers are affected.
Nosewheel attach (RV-9A)
moderateEarly RV-9A airplanes had documented service bulletin work covering the nosewheel mount, similar to the RV-6A. Verify compliance on any pre-buy. Look for the modified bushings and attach hardware.
Older avionics on early builds
moderateFirst-generation RV-9 builds from the early to mid-2000s often have aging avionics. Modern glass panel upgrades run $15,000 to $30,000.
Canopy crazing
lowThe sliding bubble canopy is a wear item. UV exposure and thermal cycling cause crazing. Replacement canopies run about $1,200 plus installation labor.
Who it's for
Good fit for
- ✓ Cross-country pilots who want excellent fuel economy at 150 KTAS
- ✓ Owners transitioning from a Cessna or Piper who want familiar handling
- ✓ Couples or two-pilot owners who fly long legs together
- ✓ Builders who don't fly aerobatics and want predictable, stable handling
- ✓ Buyers who want the cheapest Van's design to operate per hour
Less good for
- ✗ Pilots who want aerobatic capability (the RV-9 is not rated for aerobatics)
- ✗ Owners who want maximum cruise speed (the RV-7 is 15 to 20 knots faster)
- ✗ Buyers who want to outsource all maintenance
- ✗ Anyone who wants to install a 200 hp engine (the RV-9 wing isn't approved for it)
The verdict
The RV-9 is the smart-money choice in the Van's family for non-aerobatic cross-country pilots. It gets to the same destinations as an RV-7 with meaningfully better fuel economy, similar useful load, and lower insurance premiums. The longer wing also makes it the easiest Van's design to transition into from a certified airplane.
Buyers who fly aerobatics or want maximum cruise speed should look at the RV-7 instead. Everyone else who fits the two-seat mission profile is probably better served by the RV-9. It's the airplane Van's built for pilots who want to use their airplane the way most pilots actually use airplanes.
Cross-shop these
- Van's RV-7 / RV-7A →
Aerobatic side-by-side stablemate. 15 to 20 knots faster, +6/-3 g aerobatic rating, higher fuel burn. Better for pilots who want speed and aerobatic capability.
- Van's RV-6 / RV-6A →
Older side-by-side Van's design with similar performance to the RV-7. Lower acquisition cost than the RV-9, similar fuel economy, but aerobatic-rated airframe.
- Van's RV-14 / RV-14A →
Van's newest side-by-side, with a 210 hp IO-390 and a larger cabin. More performance and more refined build experience, at a $40,000 to $80,000 premium.
- Diamond DA40 NG (diesel) →
Certified alternative with similar mission profile. Diesel engine, glass panel, lower fuel cost. Higher acquisition price but turn-key buying.
- Cessna 172S Skyhawk →
The certified default for predictable cross-country. Slower than the RV-9 and less fuel-efficient, but easier to insure, easier to find a mechanic for, and easier to rent if you don't want to own.
Type club
Van's Air Force forum and EAA →Van's Air Force has an active RV-9 section covering build, ownership, and the airplane's specific service bulletin history. The forum is the single best source for which inspectors know the RV-9, which engine and prop combinations have worked well in service, and what to look for on a pre-buy. EAA chapter membership is the other essential affiliation.
Frequently asked
How much does a used Van's RV-9 cost in 2026? +
An older airplane with steam gauges trades for $70,000 to $100,000. A clean RV-9 with a glass panel and updated avionics runs $100,000 to $140,000. Low-time examples with current IFR panels occasionally trade above $150,000. The RV-9 typically sits $10,000 to $25,000 below a comparable RV-7.
Can I install a 180 hp engine in an RV-9? +
No. Van's does not approve engines over 160 hp for the RV-9 because the wing structure is sized for lower-power operations. The longer wing and lower stall speed depend on flying within the design envelope. An over-engined RV-9 is not airworthy in the experimental category as built per the plans and would require significant engineering review to certify.
Should I buy an RV-9 or an RV-7? +
Buy the RV-9 if you fly cross-country and don't care about aerobatics. The RV-9 has better fuel economy, longer range, lower stall speed, and easier transition handling. Buy the RV-7 if you want aerobatic capability or maximum cruise speed. The RV-7 is 15 to 20 knots faster at similar fuel burn and gives you a +6/-3 g aerobatic envelope. For most buyers who fly cross-country, the RV-9 is the better answer.
What's the typical fuel burn for an RV-9? +
A 150 hp O-320 RV-9 burns 6 to 6.5 gph at long-range cruise and 7 to 7.5 gph at high-speed cruise. Lean-of-peak operation with a four-cylinder engine monitor can pull cruise burn down to 5.5 gph at moderate power settings. The RV-9 is the most fuel-efficient airplane in the Van's family.
Is the RV-9 easy to transition into from a Cessna? +
Yes. The RV-9 has the most conventional handling in the Van's family thanks to its longer wing and non-aerobatic design margin. Cessna and Piper pilots find the transition more natural than into an RV-7 or RV-8. Insurance underwriters typically require 5 to 10 hours of dual instruction with a current RV pilot for transition.
Can I do my own maintenance on a used RV-9? +
Mostly yes. Experimental rules let you do most maintenance and repairs yourself. The annual condition inspection requires an A&P sign-off (no IA needed) at $400 to $900 a year. The non-aerobatic profile makes the inspection faster and cheaper than on aerobatic Van's designs. The original builder's repairman certificate doesn't transfer with the airplane.
Data sources
- Engine: Van's Aircraft Powerplants
- Fuel burn 65%: Vans Air Force RV-9 performance
- Fuel burn 75%: Vans Air Force RV-9
- Oil consumption: Lycoming O-320 operator's manual
- Engine TBO: Lycoming SI 1009 BE (Apr 24 2020)
- Prop TBO: Sensenich SB R-17
- Engine overhaul: Flying411 Lycoming O-Series overhaul cost
- Prop overhaul: Aviation Consumer 'Propeller Overhauls'
- Airframe reserve: BWI Vans Aircraft Operating Cost