single turboprop

Daher Kodiak 100

Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-34, 750 shp

Daher Kodiak 100 on a backcountry strip
Photo: Bidgee via Wikimedia Commons , licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 au .
Typical cost/hr
$583.85
Fuel @ 65%
30 gph
Engine TBO
4000 hr
Overhaul
$240,000$350,000

The Kodiak 100 is the utility single-engine turboprop. It's not pressurized. It has fixed landing gear. It's slower than a PC-12 or TBM 900 by a meaningful margin. The cabin is configured for cargo and rough operations rather than club seating. Why does it exist? Because there's a real market for a turboprop that can land on a 1,200-foot grass strip, carry a full 10 passengers or 3,500 pounds of cargo, and operate without the cost overhead of pressurization and complex retractable gear.

Quest Aircraft built the Kodiak in Sandpoint, Idaho from 2007 until Daher acquired the program in 2019. Daher has continued production and added the Kodiak 900 (longer fuselage, PT6A-140A engine) in 2022. The Kodiak 100 remains the volume aircraft. Used market prices in mid-2026 run $1.5 to $2.5 million. New aircraft from Daher start above $2.7 million. This page covers what a Kodiak 100 actually costs to own and where it gets out-competed.

History

Quest Aircraft Company was founded in 2001 specifically to design a clean-sheet utility turboprop for missionary aviation programs in remote regions. The early backers included Wycliffe Bible Translators, Mission Aviation Fellowship, and Africa Inland Mission. The design brief was specific: a turboprop that could replace aging Cessna 206s and 207s in bush operations, capable of carrying 10 passengers or substantial cargo, certifiable in the US and internationally, and operable from strips that the existing turboprops couldn't access.

First flight was 2004. FAA certification arrived in 2007. The Kodiak 100 entered service with a PT6A-34 engine (the workhorse 750 shp PT6 variant used in floatplanes and ag aircraft for decades), fixed tricycle landing gear with optional floats, and an interior configurable for 10 passengers, freight, or stretcher operations. The non-pressurized cabin is taller than a Caravan's, with a 53-by-50-inch cargo door for loading freight, snowmobiles, or medical equipment.

Quest sold to Setouchi Holdings of Japan in 2014 and was then acquired by Daher in 2019. Daher has continued Kodiak 100 production at the Sandpoint facility and introduced the Kodiak 900 in 2022 as a longer-fuselage variant with the PT6A-140A engine. The Kodiak 100 continues alongside the 900 with the original PT6A-34. About 350 Kodiaks have been delivered across both variants.

Variants

Kodiak 100 Series I and II (2007-2018)

2007-2018
Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-34, 750 shp

Original Kodiak 100 production under Quest. Series I had Garmin G900X avionics. Series II (2014+) moved to Garmin G1000. Used market $1.5 to $2.2 million.

Kodiak 100 Series III and IV (2018-present)

2018-present
Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-34, 750 shp

Daher-era Kodiak 100. Garmin G1000 NXi avionics, interior refinements, refined cargo handling features. Used market $2.0 to $2.5 million.

Performance

The Kodiak 100 cruises at about 175 KTAS at 12,000 feet, burning 35 to 40 gph of Jet A. It's not fast. It's also not pressurized, so the practical cruise altitude is limited by oxygen requirements (FL250 service ceiling on paper, more like 12,000 to 14,000 feet in practice). Long-range cruise drops to about 155 KTAS on 30 gph. Time-to-climb from sea level to 10,000 feet at gross weight is about 8 minutes.

Useful load is the Kodiak's defining number. The airplane has about 3,500 pounds of useful load. Full fuel (320 gallons usable, 2,144 lbs) still leaves 1,350 pounds for people and cargo. That's the airplane's design point: load up, fly to a strip nobody else can use, unload, and do it again. Range with reserves is about 1,100 nm at long-range cruise. The cargo door is large enough for a snowmobile or freight pallets, and the interior can be reconfigured between passenger seating and cargo mode in 30 to 45 minutes.

Powerplant

The Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-34 is the engine on the Kodiak 100. It's a free-turbine turboprop rated at 750 shp, with one of the longest fleet histories of any PT6A variant. The PT6A-34 powers Cessna Caravans, Air Tractors, DHC-3 Otters, and a long list of bush and utility aircraft. Pratt's published TBO is 4,000 hours with a hot section inspection at 1,800 hours. The engine is conservatively rated relative to its thermodynamic capability, which contributes to its fleet reliability.

Real-world reliability is the PT6A-34's defining characteristic. The engine is one of the most reliable turbines ever certified, with the longest operating history of any PT6 variant. Many Kodiak 100s in commercial utility operations reach TBO without intermediate hot section work. Pratt's parts and shop network is the most extensive in the turbine market.

Off-program engine overhauls run $240,000 to $350,000 depending on findings. The PT6A-34 has the lowest overhaul cost in the PT6 family because it's the simplest variant and the most widely overhauled. Many Kodiak operators run off-program because the airplane's commercial utility role makes ESP enrollment less universally cost-effective than in personal-owner roles.

Cost of ownership

Plan on $550 to $800 per flight hour at 200 hours a year of utilization, all-in. The Kodiak 100's cost structure is dominated by fuel and engine maintenance, with airframe maintenance lower than on pressurized retractable turboprops because there's no pressurization and no landing gear cycle. Fuel runs $195 to $280 per hour at 37 gph and $5.50 to $7 for Jet A. Engine reserves (ESP at $130 to $220 per hour, or off-program estimates equivalent) add another $150 to $230 per hour.

Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection, training) add another $80 to $130 per hour at 200 hours a year of utilization. Insurance on the Kodiak 100 is meaningfully easier than on pressurized turboprops because the airplane lacks pressurization complexity and the typical Kodiak mission has lower passenger-revenue exposure. First-time turboprop owners pay $20,000 to $40,000 a year. Established Kodiak pilots with 200-plus hours in type pay $9,000 to $16,000.

Acquisition cost in mid-2026: Series I and II Kodiaks (2007-2018) trade $1.5 to $2.2 million depending on year, hours, and equipment. Series III and IV (2018+) run $2.0 to $2.5 million. New from Daher starts above $2.7 million with shorter delivery lead times than Pilatus typically quotes. Float-equipped Kodiaks command a premium of $150,000 to $300,000 over comparable land aircraft.

Daher service network is built around the Sandpoint, Idaho factory and a growing dealer network. North American coverage is concentrated in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, where the airplane's utility mission profile is most common. East Coast service is thinner. Plan on either keeping the airplane near a service center or building a relationship with a regional turbine maintenance shop.

Fixed cost Range Frequency
Hangar (turboprop-capable)
$600$1,500 monthly
Annual inspection (typical)
$6,000$14,000 annual
Insurance (established Kodiak pilot)
$9,000$16,000 annual
Insurance (first turboprop)
$20,000$40,000 annual
Initial type training
$10,000$18,000 per-event
Annual recurrent training
$4,500$7,500 annual

Estimate the cost for your situation

Defaults are pre-filled for the Daher Kodiak 100. Tweak fuel price, hangar, insurance, and hours to match your scenario.

Your cost per hour
$583.85
Daher Kodiak 100 · Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-34, 750 shp
100 hrs/yr · 65% cruise
Per month
$4,865
Per year
$58,385
Cruise power
Pre-populated values are sourced estimates. Verify with the POH and a current quote before buying.

Common issues & gotchas

Fixed gear tire and brake wear

moderate

Fixed landing gear means tires and brakes work harder than on retractable turboprops, especially on rough strips and floats. Plan on tire replacement every 200 to 400 cycles on hard surfaces, more frequent on dirt or gravel. Brake service depends heavily on operating environment.

Float conversion maintenance

moderate

Float-equipped Kodiaks have additional inspection requirements: float corrosion, water rudder mechanism, lifting eye attachments. Float overhauls run $30,000 to $60,000 every several years depending on operating environment. Saltwater operation accelerates corrosion meaningfully.

Garmin G900X panel aging (Series I)

moderate

Series I Kodiaks have older Garmin G900X avionics that lack the database currency and feature set of current G1000 NXi systems. Many have been retrofitted or upgraded. Pre-buy avionics inspection should verify panel software currency and database support.

Cabin door seal wear

low

Cargo door seals and entry door seals see heavy use on utility aircraft. Replacement intervals fall during annual inspections. Cost is minor but the inspection workload adds up on utility-fleet aircraft.

Type-rating training compliance

moderate

The Kodiak doesn't require a type rating (it's below 12,500 lbs MTOW), but insurance underwriters typically require turboprop transition training. Most providers cluster around the Daher service center network. Plan on annual recurrent as a continuous commitment.

Who it's for

Good fit for

  • Bush, backcountry, and missionary aviation operators
  • Owners flying to short or rough strips that other turboprops can't access
  • Charter operations focused on cargo or remote-area passenger service
  • Cross-country pilots who prioritize useful load and short-field performance over speed
  • Float operators who want a serious utility floatplane with turbine reliability

Less good for

  • Owners who want pressurization for high-altitude cruise
  • Buyers prioritizing speed (PC-12 and TBM 900 are both meaningfully faster)
  • Pilots flying primarily long-haul cross-country routes (the slower cruise eats time on long legs)
  • Owners who don't want to deal with regional service-network gaps outside the Pacific Northwest

The verdict

The Kodiak 100 is the right airplane for a specific mission. Off-airport utility operations. Bush flying. Floats. Missionary aviation. Hauling people or cargo to places other airplanes can't reach. The PT6A-34 is the most reliable engine in the PT6 family. The fixed gear and non-pressurized cabin eliminate two of the most expensive maintenance categories on pressurized retractable turboprops. The acquisition cost is the lowest in the single-engine turboprop class.

But if your mission profile is anything close to mainstream personal turboprop use, the Kodiak isn't your airplane. The PC-12 outdoes it on cabin width and cruise speed. The TBM 900 outdoes it on speed by a wide margin. The M600 outdoes it on cost and modern panel features. The Kodiak earns its place by being honest about what it is: a utility airplane that does utility work cheaper and better than anything else in its class.

Cross-shop these

Type club

Kodiak Owners and Pilots Association (KOPA) →

KOPA is the type club for Kodiak owners. Annual dues run roughly $250. Members get the forum, technical articles, type-specific recurrent training, and Daher manufacturer access through KOPA. The community is smaller than POPA or TBMOPA because the production volume is lower, but the engagement level is high.

Frequently asked

How much does a Daher Kodiak 100 cost? +

Used market in mid-2026: $1.5 to $2.2 million for Series I and II (2007-2018) and $2.0 to $2.5 million for Series III and IV (2018+). Float-equipped aircraft command a premium of $150,000 to $300,000. New from Daher starts above $2.7 million.

Is the Kodiak 100 pressurized? +

No. The Kodiak is not pressurized. Practical cruise altitude is limited by oxygen requirements (12,000 to 14,000 feet typical, FL250 service ceiling on paper). The non-pressurized design eliminates a major maintenance category and contributes to the airplane's lower per-hour operating cost relative to pressurized turboprops.

What's the typical fuel burn for a Kodiak 100? +

About 35 to 40 gph of Jet A at high-speed cruise at 12,000 feet, dropping to 28 to 32 gph at long-range cruise. Climb fuel runs higher (55 to 65 gph) for the first 5 to 10 minutes.

How does the Kodiak 100 compare to a Cessna Caravan? +

Similar utility mission, different airframes. The Caravan is larger and slightly slower, with more cabin volume and a longer fleet history. The Kodiak has better short-field performance, a more modern design, and lower acquisition cost on the used market. Most utility operators choose between them based on specific cargo or passenger requirements and regional service-network coverage.

What's the engine TBO on the Kodiak 100? +

The Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-34 has a 4,000-hour TBO with a hot section inspection at 1,800 hours. The PT6A-34 is one of the most reliable PT6 variants and routinely reaches TBO in real-world operation.

Can the Kodiak land on rough strips? +

Yes. That's the airplane's design point. Documented operations from strips as short as 1,200 feet under typical conditions, with substantial useful load remaining. Tundra tires, floats, and skis are common modifications for backcountry, water, and snow operations. The airframe is engineered for repeated rough-field use without the maintenance burden that wears out civilian airplanes used in similar roles.

Data sources