Cessna 310R
Continental IO-520-M, 285 hp each (2 engines)
The Cessna 310R is the budget cabin-class twin. Production ran from 1975 to 1980 and the airplane has been off the production line for over four decades. Used market prices in mid-2026 range from $80,000 for high-time aircraft up to about $175,000 for late-model 310Rs with engine overhauls done and modern panels. That's roughly a third of what a comparable Baron 58 trades for. The catch is that you're buying a 45 to 50 year old airplane with a fuel system that's more complex than most pilots expect.
The 310R is faster than the Baron 58 on similar power. Sleek aerodynamics and the famous Cessna tip tanks make it move. It handles well in cruise. Single-engine performance is acceptable but not class-leading. The maintenance burden is meaningfully higher than a Baron. The fuel system has multiple tanks, multiple pumps, and a learning curve that ends with the pilot's checkbook if the wrong selector position gets used at the wrong time. This page covers what a 310R actually costs to own and where it gets out-competed.
History
The Cessna 310 first flew in 1953 and entered production in 1954. It was Cessna's first twin and the first US light twin with retractable gear and a flush riveted skin. The original 310 ran for 17 years through variants A through Q, building reputation as a fast, sleek, capable twin. The big tip tanks were a signature design feature, putting fuel out at the wingtips to reduce wing-bending loads and giving the airplane its characteristic silhouette.
The 310R arrived in 1975 as a major update. Cessna stretched the fuselage 36 inches, added a third cabin window per side, and improved the panel layout. The R kept the proven Continental IO-520-MB engines at 285 horsepower per side. Production continued through 1980, with about 1,180 310Rs built. The turbocharged T310R (with TSIO-520-B engines) was produced in parallel for buyers who wanted high-altitude performance, though it brought additional maintenance burden and exhaust-system ADs that made many T310Rs eventually get converted back to normally-aspirated configuration via STC.
Cessna stopped 310 production in 1980 to focus on the 340 (pressurized) and 414/421 (cabin-class twins). The 310 line was effectively replaced by the smaller Skylane RG for owner-operators who didn't need a twin. The 310R has survived as a used-market option because it delivers real twin-engine capability at a price point well below the Baron 58 or the modern Seneca V.
Variants
Cessna 310R (1975-1980)
1975-1980Normally-aspirated production model. Used market $80,000 to $175,000 depending on engines, hours, and panel. The volume variant prospective buyers should focus on.
Cessna T310R (1975-1980)
1975-1980Turbocharged variant. High-altitude performance gain, but lower TBO (1,400 to 1,600 hours), turbocharger maintenance burden, and exhaust-system AD compliance burden. Many T310Rs have been STC'd back to NA configuration. Used market premiums of $10,000 to $30,000 are largely offset by higher operating cost.
Performance
The 310R cruises at about 200 KTAS at 75% power, putting it on par with a Baron 58 and slightly faster than a Seneca V. Long-range cruise at 65% drops to about 185 KTAS on 25 to 28 gph total. The aerodynamic refinement of the Cessna 310 design (flush skin, tip tanks reducing induced drag) is real. The airplane moves well for its horsepower.
Single-engine performance is the 310R's weak point relative to peers. The airplane will hold about 220 to 250 fpm single-engine at sea level standard conditions and gross weight. That's noticeably less than a Baron 58's 270 fpm or a Seneca V's 240 fpm with smaller engines. Tip-tank fuel imbalance also gives the airplane a Dutch-roll tendency that gets worse in turbulence and worse still in low-time twin pilots' hands. Useful load is about 1,650 pounds. Full fuel (164 gallons usable on the 310R) leaves about 660 pounds for people and bags.
Powerplant
The Continental IO-520-MB on the 310R is a six-cylinder, fuel-injected, direct-drive piston engine with a 1,700-hour TBO per Continental Service Information Letter SIL 98-9E. It runs on 100LL. Field overhauls at Gann Aviation, Western Skyways, or other reputable shops run $50,000 to $60,000 per engine in 2026 prices. The IO-520-MB has been generally reliable through the Twin Cessna fleet but does share some of the same case-cracking history as other IO-520 variants. A pre-buy must include thorough case inspection.
The T310R's TSIO-520-B turbocharged engines have a 1,400-hour TBO (1,600 hours for serial numbers 1006000 and later) per SIL 98-9E. Overhauls run $55,000 to $75,000 per engine due to turbocharger work. Operating temperatures and management discipline matter more on the turbo. Many T310R operators have voluntarily de-turboed via STC to eliminate the exhaust-AD compliance burden and reduce maintenance cost.
Oil consumption on a healthy IO-520-MB runs about 0.4 to 0.6 quarts per hour per engine. Cylinder work at top-overhaul intervals (around 1,000 to 1,200 hours on hard-flown engines) runs $3,500 to $5,000 per cylinder. Both engines have six cylinders. A bad pre-buy can put a buyer into $20,000 to $40,000 of unscheduled cylinder work in the first year of ownership.
Cost of ownership
Plan on $350 to $520 per flight hour at 150 hours a year of utilization, all-in. The 310R is somewhere between the Baron 58 and the Seneca V on per-hour cost. The big variables are engine condition at purchase (which determines whether you're paying immediate top-overhaul costs or amortizing them across remaining TBO) and the fuel system condition (more on that below).
Fuel and oil run about $175 to $215 per hour at 30 gph and $5.50 to $7 fuel. Engine overhaul reserve is $60 to $80 per hour for two IO-520-MB engines at $50,000 to $60,000 each over 1,700-hour TBO. Prop overhaul reserve is about $5 to $8 per hour for two McCauley 3-blade props at $5,000 to $9,000 each (the 310R uses larger 3-blade props than most piston twins). Airframe maintenance reserve is $50 to $80 per hour, higher than a Baron 58 because the 310R's fuel system and aging airframe demand more attention.
Acquisition cost in mid-2026 runs $80,000 to $130,000 for a 310R with mid-time engines, steam-gauge panel, and basic equipment. Late-model 310Rs with fresh engines, modern Garmin avionics, and clean airframe history run $130,000 to $175,000. Turbo T310Rs with original turbo systems can be bought cheaper than NA 310Rs because operators fear the exhaust AD compliance and operating cost.
Twin Cessna Flyer (TCF) is the essential type-club resource. Annual dues are about $80 and the technical articles, member forum, and pre-buy guidance routinely save more in avoided headaches than the dues cost. TCF also publishes a comprehensive pre-buy checklist specifically for the Cessna 310, which any prospective buyer should review.
| Fixed cost | Range | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Hangar (twin-capable) | $400–$1,000 | monthly |
| Annual inspection (typical) Higher if fuel system work or AD compliance items surface. | $5,500–$11,000 | annual |
| Insurance (established twin pilot) | $6,000–$10,000 | annual |
| Insurance (first twin) | $10,000–$22,000 | annual |
| Twin transition training | $2,500–$4,500 | per-event |
Estimate the cost for your situation
Defaults are pre-filled for the Cessna 310R. Tweak fuel price, hangar, insurance, and hours to match your scenario.
Common issues & gotchas
Fuel system complexity
highThe Cessna 310 fuel system is the most complex in any owner-flown light twin. Six fuel tanks (mains, auxiliaries, lockers, tip tanks on most variants), multiple pumps, multiple selector positions. Pilot error in fuel selection has been a contributor to numerous accidents. The system also accumulates maintenance: fuel cell aging, line corrosion, pump failures, and selector valve wear. Plan on $5,000 to $15,000 in fuel system work during any 5-year ownership period.
Fuel tank mount cracking
highCracked mounts where the fuel tanks attach to the airframe are a documented inspection item. A pre-buy must include direct visual inspection of these mounts. Repairs can run $5,000 to $15,000.
Horizontal stabilizer attach bolts
highBroken horizontal stabilizer attach bolts have been documented in the 310 fleet. AD compliance inspection should be current. Replacement is a significant labor item if bolts are due for replacement.
Landing gear retraction cycle wear
moderateThe 310R's electrically-driven landing gear has motors, gearboxes, drive shafts, and rod ends that wear with cycles. Gear system overhaul typically required every 1,500 to 2,500 hours. Cost runs $4,000 to $8,000 depending on findings.
Brake disc cracking
moderateBrake disc cracking has been documented across the fleet. Routine inspection at every annual is required. Disc replacement runs $1,200 to $2,500 per side.
Dutch roll tendency
moderateThe high rotational inertia of fuel in the tip tanks contributes to a Dutch-roll tendency, particularly in turbulence and with inexperienced pilots. Yaw damper operation is essential. Tip-tank fuel management discipline matters.
T310R turbo exhaust ADs
highTurbocharged T310R aircraft have a recurring exhaust-system AD with compliance inspection requirements. Many T310Rs have been STC'd back to normally-aspirated configuration to eliminate this compliance burden. Buyers considering a T310R should price exhaust system replacement and AD compliance in the pre-buy.
Who it's for
Good fit for
- ✓ Budget-conscious twin buyers who can't justify a Baron
- ✓ Pilots who want twin-engine cross-country capability under $150,000 acquisition
- ✓ Owners willing to invest in fuel-system maintenance and pre-buy diligence
- ✓ Cross-country pilots flying 150-250 hours a year on routes where the second engine matters
Less good for
- ✗ First-time twin owners (the 310's complexity is meaningful)
- ✗ Pilots who want turn-key support and modern OEM parts depth
- ✗ Owners who'd rather have a Baron's handling and prefer not to deal with fuel-system complexity
- ✗ Buyers cross-shopping a TBM 700 or PC-12 at similar acquisition cost (different class of airplane)
The verdict
The 310R is the cheapest path into a cabin-class twin with real cross-country capability. The airplane is faster than a Baron 58 on the same power. It has plenty of useful load. It looks great on the ramp. And the acquisition price is roughly a quarter of what a comparable Baron 58 costs.
But the 310R is a 45 to 50 year old airplane with a complex fuel system that has been the proximate cause of numerous accidents. The maintenance burden is meaningfully higher than a Baron. Insurance underwriters charge appropriately for the complexity. A buyer who has never owned a twin and is shopping by price should not buy a 310R. A buyer who is willing to spend significant time on pre-buy, who has multi-engine experience, and who will operate the airplane consistently can get a real airplane for the money.
Cross-shop these
- Beechcraft Baron 58 (G58, IO-550-C) →
The cabin-class twin benchmark. Better build quality, simpler fuel system, current production. Twice the acquisition cost of a clean 310R.
- Beechcraft Baron 55 (E55, IO-520-C) →
Smaller Baron with similar acquisition cost to a 310R. Simpler fuel system, similar speed, smaller cabin. Cross-shop directly.
- piper-aztec-pa-23-250-f-model
The cheaper hauler. Lycoming O-540 power, slower than the 310R, more useful load, dramatically simpler systems. The right answer for utility-focused twin buyers.
- Piper Seneca V (PA-34-220T) →
Modern Piper twin. Turbocharged, still in production, better support depth. More expensive used than a 310R, but turn-key in a way the 310R isn't.
Type club
Twin Cessna Flyer (TCF) →TCF is the essential type club for Cessna 310, 320, 340, 401/402, 414, and 421 owners. Annual dues are about $80. The TCF pre-buy checklist for the 310 is one of the most comprehensive type-specific buyer's guides in general aviation. The TCF tech staff has fielded more 310 questions than any other organization.
Frequently asked
How much does a Cessna 310R cost? +
Used market in mid-2026: $80,000 to $130,000 for a 310R with mid-time engines and basic panel, up to $175,000 for a late-model example with fresh engines and modern avionics. T310R turbocharged variants typically trade $10,000 to $30,000 above comparable 310Rs but operating costs offset that premium.
What's the typical fuel burn for a Cessna 310R? +
A 310R burns about 30 gph total (15 gph per side) at 75% cruise, dropping to 25 to 28 gph total at 65% long-range cruise. That's at the typical IO-520-MB settings. Both engines combined. T310R turbo variants run roughly 32 to 35 gph at altitude in high-power cruise.
Is a Cessna 310R hard to fly? +
Not in the basic handling sense. The 310R is a stable airplane with predictable control feel. But the fuel system is complex. The Dutch-roll tendency is real. And single-engine performance is the weak point in the category. Most insurance underwriters require 25 to 50 hours of dual instruction before solo PIC time. Plan on a serious transition course at a Cessna 310-experienced flight school.
Should I buy a 310R or a T310R? +
Most buyers should choose the normally-aspirated 310R. The turbocharged T310R has lower TBO (1,400 hours vs 1,700), higher overhaul cost, recurring exhaust-system AD compliance, and operating temperature management that adds workload. The performance gain at altitude doesn't typically pay for the maintenance burden unless you're regularly flying above 12,000 feet.
What's the engine overhaul cost on a Cessna 310R? +
IO-520-MB overhauls at name-brand shops run $50,000 to $60,000 per engine. Multiply by two. Factory remanufactured engines from Continental run higher. Plan on $100,000 to $130,000 total for both engines if you have to pay for it during ownership.
What's the difference between a Cessna 310 and a Baron 58? +
The 310R is faster on similar power, has more aerodynamic refinement, and trades at about a quarter the price of a comparable Baron 58. The Baron has better build quality, simpler systems, better single-engine performance, and current OEM support. A clean Baron 58 G58 outpoints a clean 310R on almost every dimension except acquisition cost.
Data sources
- Engine: Aviation Consumer Cessna 310
- Fuel burn 65%: Aviation Consumer Cessna 310 owner Guy Maher (~25 gph block at 65% LOP)
- Fuel burn 75%: Cessna 310R POH cruise + AOPA
- Oil consumption: Twin Cessna Flyer community typical for IO-520-M
- Engine TBO: Continental SIL 98-9E (Aug 20 2015)
- Prop TBO: McCauley SB137AF (Mar 13 2013)
- Engine overhaul: Gann Aviation overhaul pricing
- Prop overhaul: Mike Jones Aircraft pricing (McCauley 3AF32C504 exch ~$12.5k; customer-prop OH $5-9k)
- Airframe reserve: Twin Cessna Flyer + Aviation Consumer 310