single piston

Cessna 175 Skylark

Continental GO-300-A/C/D/E (geared), 175 hp

Cessna 175 Skylark on the ramp
Photo: Acroterion via Wikimedia Commons , licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 .
Typical cost/hr
$225.05
Fuel @ 65%
9 gph
Engine TBO
1200 hr
Overhaul
$35,000$50,000

The Cessna 175 Skylark is the geared-engine experiment that didn't quite work. Production ran from 1958 to 1962 with about 2,100 built. The 175 used a Continental GO-300 engine (the 'G' means geared) with a propeller reduction gearbox between the engine and prop. The geared engine produced 175 hp at a lower prop RPM than direct-drive engines, which was supposed to deliver quieter operation and better climb. In practice, the GO-300 had a documented history of premature gear and crankshaft wear, especially when operated outside Continental's narrow recommended RPM band.

Used market prices in mid-2026 run $30,000 to $70,000 depending on engine status and whether the airplane has been converted to a non-geared engine via STC. Most flying 175s have been converted to direct-drive Continental O-300 or O-360 engines, which eliminates the GO-300 reliability concerns at the cost of meaningful retrofit work. This page covers what a Cessna 175 actually costs to own and what to verify in pre-buy.

History

Cessna introduced the 175 in 1958 as a mid-range four-seat single between the 172 (then with a 145 hp Continental O-300) and the 182 (then with a 230 hp Continental O-470). The 175 was supposed to offer better performance than the 172 without the operating cost of the 182. The choice of the Continental GO-300 geared engine was the key engineering decision. The geared reduction allowed the engine to turn faster (3,200 RPM redline) while the propeller turned slower (2,400 RPM at cruise) for quieter operation and better prop efficiency.

The GO-300 had problems. Pilots accustomed to direct-drive engines often operated the GO-300 below its required RPM band during cruise, which damaged the gear-train and shortened cylinder life. The factory-recommended cruise RPM was higher than what most pilots intuitively wanted to fly. Premature gear wear, crankshaft damage, and unscheduled overhauls became common. The 175 acquired a reputation for being a maintenance-hungry airplane, deserved or not.

Cessna ended 175 production in 1962 and dropped the variant entirely. The lineup consolidated around the direct-drive 172 (which got more power over the years) and the 182 (which remained the 230 hp Continental). Total 175 production was about 2,100 aircraft. Many surviving 175s have been converted to direct-drive engines via STC paths from various providers, which solves the GO-300 reliability question. Aircraft with original GO-300 engines remain in the fleet but trade at meaningful discounts to converted examples.

Variants

Cessna 175 / 175A / 175B / 175C (1958-1962)

1958-1962
Continental GO-300-A, -C, -D, or -E (geared), 175 hp

Production variants. Minor cosmetic and equipment differences across model years. All use the GO-300 geared engine. Used market $30,000 to $50,000 for original-engine examples.

Cessna 175 with STC engine conversion

1958-1962 airframe with retrofit engine
Continental O-300 (direct drive) or Lycoming O-360 (via STC)

Airplane converted from GO-300 to direct-drive engine. Eliminates the geared-engine reliability concerns. Used market $50,000 to $75,000 depending on engine specifics and equipment.

Performance

The original 175 with GO-300 engine cruises at about 117 KTAS at 75% power, burning 10 gph of 100LL. That's noticeably more fuel burn than a direct-drive 172 of similar vintage with the C-145 / O-300 at 145 hp. The 175 was supposed to deliver better cruise and climb than the early 172, but the GO-300's narrow operating range and the geared system's parasitic losses meant the practical performance gain was modest.

Useful load on a 175 is about 870 pounds. Full fuel (39 gallons usable) leaves about 635 pounds for people and bags. Four adults of typical weight plus light luggage fit comfortably within gross. Range with reserves is about 600 nm at long-range cruise. Service ceiling is 15,900 ft on paper but the GO-300's altitude performance drops off above 6,000 to 8,000 ft DA. Aircraft with STC engine conversions vary based on the conversion. O-300 conversions cruise similarly to the original. O-360 conversions add 5 to 10 knots and meaningfully improve climb.

Powerplant

The Continental GO-300 is the engine the 175 was designed around. It's a six-cylinder, geared, direct-drive piston engine rated at 175 hp at 3,200 engine RPM (2,400 prop RPM through the 0.75:1 reduction gear). Continental's published TBO is 1,200 hours per Continental Service Information Letter SIL 98-9E, one of the shortest TBOs in the certified engine market. Continental has not produced new GO-300s in decades. Parts and overhaul shops with GO-300 experience are limited.

Field overhauls on a GO-300 run $35,000 to $50,000 in 2026 prices, depending on what the gearbox and cylinders need. Specialty shops with GO-300 expertise are concentrated in a few locations and lead times can be substantial. Many 175 owners have used overhaul events as the opportunity to convert to a direct-drive engine, which costs about the same as a GO-300 overhaul and eliminates ongoing parts and operating concerns.

STC conversion to a direct-drive Continental O-300 (145 hp, the engine the 172 used in the same era) is the most common conversion path. Conversion to Lycoming O-360 (180 hp, the engine the 172N and 177 used) is also available and adds horsepower at the cost of more substantial retrofit work. Engine conversion adds $25,000 to $45,000 to a GO-300 overhaul cost (so total conversion-and-install runs $55,000 to $90,000), but the operating-cost and parts-availability advantages typically pay back within 3 to 5 years of ownership.

Cost of ownership

Plan on $130 to $200 per flight hour at 75 hours a year of utilization, all-in, for an original GO-300 175. The cost structure is dominated by the engine. Fuel and oil run about $58 to $75 per hour at 10 gph and $5.50 to $7 for 100LL. Engine overhaul reserve is $30 to $42 per hour based on a $35,000 to $50,000 overhaul amortized across the 1,200-hour TBO, the highest engine reserve per hour of any small Cessna. Airframe maintenance reserve is $15 to $25 per hour.

Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add another $40 to $80 per hour at 75 hours a year of utilization. Insurance on the 175 is moderate. Hull values are relatively low. First-time owners pay $1,800 to $3,500 a year typically.

Acquisition cost in mid-2026: 175s with original GO-300 engines and high time run $30,000 to $45,000. 175s with mid-time GO-300 engines and reasonable airframe condition run $40,000 to $55,000. STC-converted aircraft (with direct-drive O-300 or O-360 engines) run $50,000 to $75,000 and offer meaningfully better long-term operating economics. The conversion premium often pays for itself within 3 to 5 years through lower engine reserves and reduced parts-availability friction.

The International Cessna 170 Association covers the 175 as part of its broader vintage Cessna community support. Annual dues are about $50. The Association has accumulated decades of 175-specific knowledge, including engine-conversion guidance and shop recommendations. Most 175 ownership decisions benefit from consulting Association resources.

Fixed cost Range Frequency
Hangar (smaller field)
$175$400 monthly
Annual inspection (vintage airframe)
$1,500$3,500 annual
Insurance (typical owner)
$1,800$3,500 annual
International Cessna 170 Association dues
$45$55 annual

Estimate the cost for your situation

Defaults are pre-filled for the Cessna 175 Skylark. Tweak fuel price, hangar, insurance, and hours to match your scenario.

Your cost per hour
$225.05
Cessna 175 Skylark · Continental GO-300-A/C/D/E (geared), 175 hp
100 hrs/yr · 65% cruise
Per month
$1,875
Per year
$22,505
Cruise power
Pre-populated values are sourced estimates. Verify with the POH and a current quote before buying.

Common issues & gotchas

GO-300 reduction gear wear

high

The GO-300's reduction gear is the engine's defining weakness. Premature wear is common, especially on engines that have been operated below the factory-recommended RPM band during cruise. Gear inspection at overhaul is critical and gear replacement adds substantial cost when needed.

GO-300 parts and shop availability

high

Continental no longer manufactures new GO-300s. Overhaul shops with GO-300 expertise are concentrated in a few locations and lead times can run months. Cylinders and gearbox components have particularly limited supply. Many 175 owners convert to direct-drive engines for this reason.

Engine conversion documentation

moderate

175s with STC engine conversions need current STC paperwork, weight-and-balance documentation, and 337 logbook entries. Pre-buy should verify all conversion paperwork is current and the airplane is in compliance with the STC's terms of approval.

Vintage airframe corrosion

high

1958-1962 production aircraft are 63 to 67 years old. Airframe corrosion in spar carry-through, wing root, and tail attach areas is common. Pre-buy corrosion inspection is essential. Same AD compliance considerations as the Cessna 170 family due to shared airframe heritage.

Original avionics generation

moderate

Original 175 panels are vacuum-tube radios and steam-gauge instruments from the 1950s. Most flying examples have been panel-upgraded but quality varies. Pre-buy avionics inspection should include power-up of every system.

Fuel tank aging

moderate

Wet-wing fuel tanks on 175s can develop seam or skin leaks after 60+ years. Repair runs $1,500 to $3,500 depending on scope.

Who it's for

Good fit for

  • Buyers specifically looking for a vintage four-seat Cessna at the lowest possible acquisition cost
  • Owners willing to invest in engine conversion if the original GO-300 needs major work
  • Vintage aircraft enthusiasts who specifically want a 175
  • Pilots who can find an STC-converted 175 at reasonable price (best long-term value in the type)

Less good for

  • First-time owners who want a turn-key airplane (the GO-300 demands engine-specific knowledge)
  • Buyers cross-shopping a 172N or 172P (the post-1970 172s are more practical for almost all missions)
  • Owners who don't want to deal with engine conversion economics
  • Pilots in regions without GO-300-experienced shops

The verdict

The Cessna 175 is the cheapest path into a vintage four-seat Cessna, but the GO-300 engine is a structural complication. Aircraft with original GO-300 engines trade at the low end of the price range because the engine demands specialized knowledge and parts are limited. Aircraft with STC engine conversions are the better long-term buy and trade at meaningfully higher prices for good reason. The conversion premium typically pays back within 3 to 5 years through lower engine reserves and easier parts availability.

For most buyers shopping vintage four-seat Cessnas, the 170B is a more refined choice and the 172 (early or late production) is a more practical choice. The 175 makes sense for specific buyers: vintage enthusiasts who want the 175 specifically, budget-conscious buyers who can find a converted example at a reasonable price, or owners willing to invest in engine conversion as part of their ownership plan. For everyone else, the 175 trades cheaper than peers for structural reasons that need to be priced into the buy decision.

Cross-shop these

Type club

International Cessna 170 Association →

The dedicated type club for Cessna 170 owners also covers the 175 due to shared airframe heritage and overlapping ownership community. Annual dues run about $50. Members get the forum, technical articles, and accumulated 175-specific knowledge including engine-conversion guidance and shop recommendations.

Frequently asked

How much does a Cessna 175 cost? +

Used market in mid-2026: $30,000 to $45,000 for 175s with original GO-300 engines and high time, $40,000 to $55,000 for 175s with mid-time GO-300 engines, and $50,000 to $75,000 for STC-converted aircraft with direct-drive engines.

What's wrong with the GO-300 engine? +

The geared reduction system in the GO-300 is prone to premature gear wear, especially when operated below Continental's recommended cruise RPM band. New GO-300s have not been produced in decades. Parts availability is limited and overhaul shop expertise is concentrated in a few locations. Many 175 owners convert to direct-drive engines via STC for these reasons.

Should I buy a 175 with original engine or converted? +

For most buyers, the converted aircraft is the better choice. The conversion premium (typically $20,000 to $40,000) pays for itself within 3 to 5 years through lower engine reserves, easier parts availability, and reduced operating concerns. Aircraft with original GO-300 engines work for buyers who can manage the engine specifics and who plan to either operate within the GO-300's tight tolerances or convert at overhaul time.

What's the typical fuel burn for a 175? +

About 10 gph of 100LL at 75% cruise for the original GO-300, dropping to 8.5 gph at long-range cruise. Converted aircraft vary based on the engine. O-300 conversions run 7.5 to 8.5 gph. O-360 conversions run 8 to 9 gph with more power available.

What's the engine overhaul cost on a Cessna 175? +

Plan on $35,000 to $50,000 for a GO-300 overhaul at a specialty shop. STC conversion to Continental O-300 or Lycoming O-360 adds $25,000 to $45,000 over GO-300 overhaul cost (total $55,000 to $90,000), but eliminates the GO-300 ongoing concerns.

Why was the Cessna 175 discontinued? +

Sales were weaker than Cessna projected, partly due to early reliability concerns with the GO-300 engine. The 175 was positioned between the 172 and the 182 but didn't develop a clear market identity. Cessna ended production in 1962 after about 2,100 aircraft and consolidated the lineup around the direct-drive 172 and 182. The geared-engine experiment was not repeated in subsequent Cessna designs.

Data sources